 |
|
SMEs Urged to Take on Non-Executive Directors
|
Placing a non-executive director (NED) on a board can have the same impact on a business as changing the chef
at a restaurant or installing a new head at a school. It can be a transformation, says Hanson Green, the UK’s
leading provider of NEDs.
But consultant Peter Waine says some small to medium-sized companies may be put off professionally appointing
an NED either because they have such a tight budget or that they feel they are insufficiently attractive.
“We have literally transformed companies through the quality of our independent director appointments. They can
bring the business back to core activities, they can help colleagues plan well ahead for either a possible sale
or exit for the founders, or even to encourage reinvestment and therefore to look at the longer term. In addition
they can look at succession planning, can act as a conduit between subsidiaries and the main board and, in the
case of entrepreneurs, help them to be sufficiently focused and when necessary run the firm in a less
personalised way.
“But with smaller firms the fear is that they cannot afford to make a mistake. They have got no fat. It is
therefore important that when they do appoint an NED they adopt many of the disciplines of the larger firms.
They should run the business as if it is a public company making sure that things like the management accounts
are produced on time.”
An initiative run by Hanson Green is helping smaller companies make this leap. The Annex programme is a two-way
business enterprise which matches small businesses seeking NEDs to large companies looking to motivate and
groom some of their high-calibre employees for the boardroom. The company the NED candidate comes from pays
the Hanson Green fee and the receiving company pays the NED. The NED fee can be paid back into the lending
company’s training budget.
“The company the candidate comes from gets someone who has been exposed to a different culture. The candidate
may be in a different sector and he or she can feed back to his own board. The director goes to teach and comes
away learning and it prepares them either for promotion to the main board or if recently appointed to become a
better generalist. The receiving company gets a high quality candidate at low cost
“One of the beauties of an NED is that he or she can reflect the changing needs of a company more easily than
an executive director, but they can also offer continuity if the executives come and go.” For this reason,
Waine says, the length of the NED’s tenure is less important than the relevance they bring to the boardroom.
Waine believes the best development to emerge from Derek Higgs’ review of the role of NEDs is that companies
will no longer be able to hide behind a façade of corporate governance. “Some companies don’t believe greatly
in corporate governance and they have been able to hide, by at least having the right number of NEDs in place
even if they haven’t recruited them for their independence to challenge the board. Indeed they have found it
much harder to adopt a slightly insincere attitude and of course that is good news for all concerned.”
|
|
Hanson Green consultant Peter Waine on:
NED characteristics
“They need to have curiosity, courage and the right chemistry. The best ones are those who go in as generalists.
They don’t go in to rectify some technical imbalance on the board. Also, they shouldn’t go in because of their
network of contacts. It normally just raises expectations which are then dashed and it cashes in goodwill.”
Boardroom bullying
“Much of the remuneration process is done very feebly. There is a lot of bullying by executive directors who
threaten to leave if they don’t get what they want. I think more NEDs should stand up to that attitude and let
them move on.”
NED pay
“For medium to smaller companies, it is possible to get an NED for about £25,000 or £30,000 per annum.
If you over-pay an NED you compromise their independence and this is counter productive to both sides.”
CEO becoming chairman
“I’m totally against this. They are utterly different roles. The chairman runs the board, the chief
executive runs the company. If the chief executive becomes the chairman his successor is going to be in
a very awkward position particularly if he or she wants to challenge strategy – the legacy of their predecessor.
It also denies the company the opportunity to bring in fresh blood.”
The future?
“The final version of Higgs, necessarily watered down and phrased more palatably, is a fine
culmination of the corporate governance reports and reviews which preceded it. However, there is a fear
that government may want a quick fix and that this will result in greater regulation and may destroy the
code of practice culture which has worked well since Cadbury.”
© 2003 non-execs.com
|